3. Does a wrong action become right if a majority approves?
Imagine a stockbroker is pitching you on a retirement fund. Then he pulls out a gun and forces you to buy his plan. Does that wrong become right if the retirement program is called Social Security and a majority endorses it? How much aggression are you willing to use on people so long as a majority agrees? Use the slider below to register your opinion.
Need help understanding the slider?
Pick 0% if you want to address the need for retirement income using only peaceful persuasion and voluntary cooperation.
Pick 10 or 20% if you want a tax-funded safety net focused only on seniors in dire need.
Pick 30 or 40% if you want a dragnet plan (like Social Security) that includes both the rich and poor.
Pick 50 or 60% if you want to increase taxes to keep Social Security solvent.
Pick 70 or 80% if you want to control how people invest their savings.
Pick 90 or 100% if you want The State to control all savings, investment, and retirement income.
Pick 10 or 20% if you want a tax-funded safety net focused only on seniors in dire need.
Pick 30 or 40% if you want a dragnet plan (like Social Security) that includes both the rich and poor.
Pick 50 or 60% if you want to increase taxes to keep Social Security solvent.
Pick 70 or 80% if you want to control how people invest their savings.
Pick 90 or 100% if you want The State to control all savings, investment, and retirement income.
Click Here to get a report showing "What the Crowd Thinks…" about this issue
Discover the 4 reasons you’ll want this instant report
This report will tell you THREE things...
- How many people moved toward persuasion or away from it, and by how much?
- How your Aggression Quotient (A.Q.) compares with the average A.Q for this issue?
- How many people joined the Zero Aggression Project through the Aggression Tracker for this issue?
Please check your inbox. We must confirm a real person requested this report.