6

Six things left-statists get wrong about Walmart

Do left-statists actually dislike people who can only afford to shop at Walmart? Retweet
Costco vs. Walmart
By Perry Willis
In this article…

  • Should Walmart be like Costco?
  • Six ways that Walmart and Costco are different
  • How Walmart and Costco serve different social functions
  • How demanding that Walmart be like Costco is like saying “Let them eat cake!”
  • The best way to test your ideas about how companies should operate
  • How the Zero Aggression Principle can protect you from being a jerk

Subtlety doesn’t work at Christmas parties.
At a recent Christmas party, the subject of wages, jobs, and, inevitably, the evils of Walmart came up. I observed that I knew nothing about Walmart. This expression of humility was intended as an example worthy of emulation, but I don’t think the message got across. What I really meant was…
Walmart isn’t my business. I have my own business to tend. I no more believe I could better run Walmart than Walmart’s managers could viably run my organization. Sure, there are some overlapping skills, but different talents are required for each enterprise. Alas…
Many left-statists are very certain they do know better.
You’ve heard it often. Left-statists believe Walmart should be run like Costco. Specifically, they assert that….
Walmart’s wage structure should match Costco’s.
Excuse my bluntness, but that’s mind-numbingly stupid. The people who make this claim are completely unqualified to evaluate business models. It should be obvious to any moderately skillful observer that Walmart and Costco are not doing the same thing or serving the same customers.
Yes, they are both retail stores that sell mostly food and products for the home. Yes, they both offer low unit prices (with unit being the key word, as I will demonstrate). The similarities end there. The variances are far more significant. Let’s count the ways that…
Walmart and Costco are different.
One. The differences start at the front door. Costco requires a membership card. Walmart doesn’t.
Two. The differences continue inside the door. Costco displays most of its products on pallets. Walmart uses smaller shelves.
Three. The differences continue at the level of the products themselves. Costco sells big packages that generally contain a large quantity of the product. Walmart sells small packages that contain a proportionally smaller amount of each item.
Four. Costco employees don’t need to breakdown their large unit packages for arrangement on shelves. They just roll out the pallets and walk away. This means that one employee can put a large amount of product on display with very little effort. But visit Walmart late at night and you’ll see pallets there too. They’re clogging the aisles while swarms of employees move each little item from the pallet to its designated spot on a shelf. This is a labor-intensive task compared to the Costco approach, but it serves an actual social need, as I will demonstrate.
Five. Lower-income people generally lack the cash-flow to buy large quantity packages. They must instead return to the store more often to buy smaller packages, as needed. Costco and Walmart unit prices are, in my experience, similar. But a package of ten items that goes for $20 takes a bigger bite out of a tight, weekly budget than does a single unit package that costs $2. You can see this difference manifested in the customers you see in each store…
Costco customers look more affluent than Walmart customers.
In other words…

  • Costco makes its living by selling relatively large volume packages to more affluent customers.
  • Walmart makes its living selling smaller packages more often to lower income customers.
  • Both are offering discounts based on volume. Costco achieves high volume with each package sold, while Walmart achieves high volume by selling an increased number of small units over time. All of this means that…

Six. Costco functions with fewer employees that it compensates more highly, while Walmart needs many more employees that it has to compensate less.
This difference is readily apparent. You see few employees on the floor in Costco, while Walmart is swarming with them. I wouldn’t be surprised if their payrolls were actually similar in size, but Walmart employs more people. This difference is because of the different social function each company serves.
Wait, there’s a social function to these business models?
Yes. Costco’s social function is to help high-income people save time on shopping. And the nature of its clientele also allows it to charge slight premiums for a select number of higher quality goods. Walmart can do neither thing. Instead, Walmart’s social function is to help low-income people manage their tight budgets. Saying that Walmart should be like Costco is like saying…
Let them eat cake!
Do left-statists actually dislike people who can only afford to shop at Walmart?
You do not improve the world by forcing people who can only afford bread, to buy cake instead. But that’s exactly what you would be doing if you forced Walmart to become Costco. Walmart cannot become Costco. Each performs a different social service. That’s why there are at least six major differences in how each company operates. There are probably even more. I don’t know because it’s not my business.
If you really want to compare apples to apples, then you should probably compare Costco with Sam’s Club, which is largely a Costco clone run by the Walmart company. I bet there are nothing like six differences between Sam’s Club and Costco.
Conclusion
It’s natural to have ideas about how other people should conduct their business. But it’s arrogant to think that those ideas should be forced on people through law or regulation (or often, even though boycotting behavior).
The truth is that you really don’t know what you’re talking about. It’s not your business. You have no direct experience with it. Your desire to mind other people’s business has no more validity than your neighbor’s attempt to mind yours. So…
Drop the arrogance. Stop trying to get The State to impose your schemes and preferences on others. Be less impressed by your own good intentions. Resolve to only use good means to achieve your good ends. Simply put, obey the Zero Aggression Principle — Don’t aggress against others, personally or politically. And if you still feel the need to “DO something,” then…
Go into competition with the offending company. Show the world that your idea really is better, and not mere bloviation. Put your own money where your loud mouth is. You may counter that starting a business is hard. Yes, it is hard. That’s the freaking point. It’s easy to have ideas about what other people should do when you don’t have to do the work involved.
Voting to impose things on companies is much easier than actually starting and running one. That crucial difference between mere opinion and real responsibility ‘s why your allegedly wonderful impositions shouldn’t be allowed.
If you like this article…

  • Share it with others
  • Use the subscribe form, in the gold box on this page, to get more like it

Show Comments 6

 

  1. “If you really want to compare apples to apples, then you should probably compare Costco with Sam’s Club, which is largely a Costco clone run by the Walmart company. I bet there are nothing like six differences between Sam’s Club and Costco.”

    Yes. Sam’s is to Costco as Walmart is to Target. The arguable differences become much diminished when you compare like to like.

    1. Post
      Author

      The problem is that I NEVER hear a left-statist say that Walmart ought to pay its workers the way Sam’s Club does. But I constantly hear them say that about CostCo. So, for the actual issue I’m analyzing, CostCo is exactly the right choice. I can’t speak to any of your other claims about Sam’s Club vs. Walmart or CostCo, because I’ve never been inside a Sam’s Club and I know nothing about their compensation structure.

  2. I like the ideas and concepts behind this article, but feel I cannot share this with people due to the combative tone of several portions of it.

    “Excuse my bluntness, but that’s mind-numbingly stupid.”
    “Drop the arrogance. … Be less impressed by your own good intentions.”

    Also, I don’t know if categorizing people as left-statist is helpful to the discussion. I am working on the assumption that you are attempting to highlight the problems with the ideas, not perpetuate factional warfare.

    I want to share this with people to help them think about whether the policies that many people advocate for are going to achieve the things they intend, not alienate them with labels and judgements of the people that may currently hold these attitudes.

    A few minor tweaks may make people more receptive. There was a comment made to me that related to Walmart’s impact on people, and how it made some people rich. I immediately thought of this blog post, but had to reconsider due to the tone. I had someone close to me review the contents and provide their thoughts.

    I agree with the concepts and goals of this organization. Please interpret this as an attempt at constructive feedback, not a complaint or criticism. Hopefully I didn’t fail in that attempt.

    1. Post
      Author

      Thanks for the constructive criticism Jeremy. I agree with most of it and plan to edit the article accordingly.

      I wrote this piece during a period when I was considering ending several long-standing friendships with left-statists. I was in a very bad mood. I was coming to the conclusion, and now currently believe, that most people of the Left are completely impervious to logic or evidence. I do not believe we are going to persuade very many of them of anything any time soon. I expect such persuasion to only become possible at the margins once we grow large enough in organized numbers to achieve visibility parity. When the Left has to hear our ideas as often as we have to hear theirs (because of their control of the schools, the media, the bureaucracy, and roughly half of our elective bodies), then some persuasion might begin to happen (mostly through subconscious processes). In the meantime, I think most attempts to persuade left-statists will acheive little. However…

      It doesn’t mean we shouldn’t try. If persuasion is mostly a subconscious thing, as I believe it is, then it always begins with the simple sharing of ideas. An idea planted today could explode twenty years from now (especially after we achieve visibility parity). I explore that idea in one of our Mental Lever mini-articles — the Mental Depth Charge. So I will edit the Walmart article in the hope that you can use it to plant a Mental Depth Charge.

      The one change I won’t make is to remove the term left-statist. I think all of the leftist labels are false and propagandistic. Left-statism is neither liberal nor progressive nor socialist (there is nothing more anti-social than so-called socialism.) My label is more honest and accurate. They don’t deny that they’re of the Left, or that they favor expanded state power. It would be a self-contradiction for them to complain about the term left-statist. Let them grapple with the cognitive dissonance.

      I’m going to apply the edits now, and will leave another comment when I’m done. I hope they prove sufficient to your purpose. Thanks again for the constructive criticism. — Perry Willis

      1. Thank you, I’ll re-read through and try to get this in front of some people. I appreciate your honesty and willingness to adjust.

    2. Post
      Author

      Hello again Jeremy. I’ve made the edits. One more thought about the term left-statist, I think it too is a Mental Depth Charge. I hope you decide to share, despite your discomfort with that term.

Leave a Reply to David Cancel reply

Fields marked with * are required